- ActionAid
- Focus areas of our work
- How we work
- Countries we work in
- Examples and results
- The organisation
Forestry - a plea for the shamba system
Kenya’s forest cover has reduced drastically since independence. However, this reduction is not caused by the much debated shamba system.
By Dominic WalubengoThe forests in Kenya can be divided into two broad categories of natural (indigenous) forests and plantation forests. The natural forests are sub-divided into forests on mountains, lowland forests and at the coast and forests in the dry lands. Some indigenous forests are remnants of the rain forests stretching from Kenya to the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Plantation forests on the other hand are found mainly in the highlands of the Rift Valley, in the Mau complex and parts of western Kenya. These forests are in reality crops of exotic trees.
Before 1897, Kenya did not have any plantation forests. These were introduced for two main reasons: to supply fuel to the train’s steam engines and to provide timber for construction.
It goes without saying that indigenous forests were cleared to make way for these exotic tree plantations. And for this, a lot of labour was needed. To limit the cost of labour, the colonial government imported a plantation system from Burma (now Myanmar). This system has developed into what we commonly refer to as the shamba system.
In the shamba system, neighboring communities assist in the establishment of forest plantations while growing their own crops such as maize or beans. The Forest Department has elaborate rules on how the shamba system should operate. If these are followed, the system works very well. Indeed, the shamba system remains the best and cheapest way of establishing forest plantations.
In February 2001 the government declared its intention to reallocate 167,000 acres of forestland and ban the shamba system. As this intention was declared, some land had already been allocated to individuals and companies. A case in point is that of Ngong and Karura forests. These two forests are threatened not by the shamba system, but by the “developers” who seem to be everywhere and yet invisible.
A well-known forest scholar Dr. John Kaboggoza, at the Faculty of Forestry and Nature Conservation Makerere University, Uganda, was astounded when he heard that Kenya had stopped the shamba system. “How will you establish forest plantations without the shamba system? The forest adjacent communities will dislike forests intensely and even burn them down!” he said.
After 3 years the total governmental expenditure for 5,000 hectares of forest plantation is Kshs. 204,000,000.
The cost of establishing the shamba system comes down to Kshs 1,700 per hectare, while maintenance is free, as the cultivators weed the trees as they look after their crop.
After 3 years the total governmental expenditure for 5,000 hectares of shamba system is Kshs. 8,500,000.
Food security: Using the shamba system the average production per hectare is in the region of 50 bags of maize and 20 bags of beans per year. Thus 5,000 hectares would produce 250,000 of maize and 100,000 bags of beans.
FAN recommends:
The Minister for Environment and Natural Resources lifts the ban on the shamba system with immediate effect to enable forest adjacent communities to take advantage of the current short rains.
The Forest Department works closely with NGOs and Community Forest Associations as a way to improve management of the shamba system.











